The product assumes one organisation
Data, settings, roles, branding, and workflows are not yet safely separated across multiple customer accounts.
16 · Floatger service
We design and engineer software-as-a-service products with connected attention to tenant boundaries, onboarding, permissions, billing integrations, operations, and sustainable product evolution.
The context
Build a service that is ready for multiple customers, plans, and operating responsibilities. The right starting point is a shared understanding of the problem—not a predetermined feature list.
Data, settings, roles, branding, and workflows are not yet safely separated across multiple customer accounts.
Plans, trials, usage, entitlements, invoicing, and account state lack a coherent product and technical model.
Onboarding, support access, auditing, monitoring, data export, offboarding, and platform administration are overlooked.
What the work may include
The exact mix is agreed after understanding your current situation, priorities, and constraints.
Clarify customers, tenants, users, value, plans, entitlements, onboarding, support, and lifecycle journeys.
Design appropriate data isolation, identity, roles, configuration, audit, integration, and scaling boundaries.
Connect approved billing providers to trials, plans, invoices, entitlements, account changes, and exception handling.
Prepare administration, monitoring, support tooling, documentation, backups, recovery, privacy, and product evolution practices.
Potential outputs
Outputs depend on the scope and stage of the engagement. They are agreed before delivery begins and refined as the work becomes clearer.
Planning the engagement
Useful delivery starts with the right context and an agreed way to evaluate progress—not an assumption that every possible concern belongs in scope.
Payment providers, tax treatment, accounting, consumer law, privacy, and regional compliance require client and specialist decisions. Engineering can implement agreed rules and integrations but does not provide legal, tax, or financial advice.
Delivery path
Each stage creates enough clarity for the decisions that follow, while keeping the process proportionate to the work.
Define customers, tenants, users, plans, roles, data, and lifecycle states.
Set boundaries for identity, isolation, integration, scale, security, and operation.
Deliver the priority product, account, subscription, and administration journeys.
Prepare support, monitoring, recovery, learning, and ongoing product decisions.
Engagement shape
Define customers, tenancy, plans, workflows, risks, and a practical first release.
Design, engineer, integrate, test, and prepare the agreed service for operation.
Strengthen product capabilities, reliability, administration, integrations, and lifecycle practices as usage develops.
Service questions
Not in the same form. The appropriate isolation model depends on customers, data sensitivity, configuration, scale, support, cost, and compliance requirements.
Yes, using an agreed provider and documented plan, entitlement, invoice, tax, cancellation, refund, webhook, and exception rules.
Potentially, but it requires assessment of product fit, tenancy, security, identity, configurability, licensing, support, operations, and commercial workflows.
The client and relevant legal, tax, or financial advisers own those decisions. We implement the agreed rules and provider integrations within the technical scope.
Architecture should respond to credible usage patterns and service needs. We define observable capacity assumptions and an evolution path instead of assuming unlimited scale on day one.
Start a conversation
Share the context, current state, and what you need to move forward. We will help identify a sensible starting point.